|
FAQS -
Frequently asked Questions, and Answers,
on the Messianic Jewish faith & Yeshua the Messiah
Question: Is there a difference between
"Jew," "Hebrew" and "Israelite"?
Answer: For many centuries the Jewish
community has considered the terms "Jew," "Hebrew"
and "Israelite" (or "Israeli") to be synonymous. The
New Testament affirms this understanding, since it uses all three terms
interchangeably. At first the term "Jew" referred exclusively
to those who were from the tribe of Judah, but eventually it was applied
to people from all twelve tribes. That is why Paul could say that he was
a Hebrew of the Hebrews (Philippians 3:5), an Israeli (Romans 11:1), and
a Jew from Tarsus, even though he was from the tribe of Benjamin (Acts
21:39). To this day the three terms may still be used to refer to anyone
who is part of the Jewish people. (Loren Jacobs)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Question: I understand that the First
Jerusalem Council didn't demand that the new Gentile Believers keep all
of the commandments right away, but doesn't Acts 15:21 teach that as
these new Believers matured, they should learn Torah at their own pace,
and become more Torah observant?
Answer: There is a better way to
understand Acts 15:21. Acts 15 records the decision of Messiah's
Emissaries (the Apostles) and the Elders of Messiah's Holy Community
(the Church) regarding the relationship of Gentile Christians to the 613
laws of the Torah. In Messianic circles, this meeting is often referred
to as "the First Jerusalem Council." According to the binding
decision issued by the Emissaries and Elders, guided and inspired by the
Holy Spirit, apart from saving faith in Messiah Yeshua, only four things
are obligatory for Gentile Believers to observe (see Acts 15, especially
verses 19-20, 28-29). It was understood that obedience to moral law -
laws such as not murdering, not stealing, and not committing adultery,
which God has written on everyone's heart, were also included (see
Romans 2:14-15). After these four requirements were given, in the very
next verse (15:21), Ya'akov (James) said, "For Moses from ancient
generations has in every city those who preach him, since he is read in
the synagogues every Sabbath."
Ya'akov, the Messiah's brother and the head of the Community of
Believers in Jerusalem, was not saying that Gentile Believers should
start off slow, with just the four requirements previously mentioned,
and then move on to more Torah observance, and learn about Torah
observance from those in the synagogue. No, Ya'akov was summarizing the
Council's position and making the very same point, but in another way -
that the 613 commandments are not required of the Gentile Believers -
only those four things mentioned (along with the moral laws that God has
written on everyone's heart), and that this is what Moses taught, and
what the synagogues teach. Even today, non-Messianic synagogues teach
the same thing - that Gentiles don't need to become Jews, or follow all
613 commandments, in order to be right with God. (Loren Jacobs)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Question: Isn't it wrong to call yourself
"Rabbi" in light of Matthew 23:8?
Answer: Let's take a look at Yeshua's
teaching in Matthew 23:8-12: "Do not be called Rabbi; for One is
your Teacher, and you are all brothers. Do not call anyone on Earth your
father; for One is your Father, He who is in Heaven. Do not be called
leaders; for One is your Leader, that is, Messiah. But the greatest
among you shall be your servant. Whoever exalts himself shall be
humbled; and whoever humbles himself shall be exalted."
One of the most important principles that will help us correctly
interpret the Word of God is: "If the literal sense makes sense,
seek no other sense." The Word of God is to be understood in its
historical/ grammatical context. If a passage makes literal sense
historically and grammatically, then that is what it means. However, if
the literal sense is impossible or does not make sense, we should seek a
non-literal sense. In the passage we are considering, Yeshua's words
about not being called "rabbi," "father" or
"leader" are not meant to be understood in a strictly
literally way. If we interpreted these words with a 'wooden' literalism,
then we could not call anyone on Earth "father" (without
exception). But of course we have earthy fathers, and it is right to
honor them with the term "father." In fact, the Holy
Scriptures frequently use the term "father" to describe human
beings, even in a religious sense (see 1 Corinthians 4:15). The New
Testament also acknowledges the word "leader" as a legitimate
term (see the Letter to the Messianic Jews - "Hebrews" 13:17,
24). The term "rabbi" is defined for us in John 1:38 as
"teacher." Again, according to the New Testament, the office
of teacher is specifically part of the leadership of the New Covenant
Community (see Ephesians 4:11). Ya'akov (James) also acknowledges the
office of teacher (James 3:1).
The rest of the passage tells us that the Messiah is concerned about
pride among us, about the desire to be exalted, about the desire to rule
and not to serve. Those who are leaders and teachers and fathers in the
Faith are not to develop an attitude that demands unquestioning
submission. They are to be servant-leaders. Nor is Messiah's Holy
Community of Jews and Gentiles to develop an elite group of
clergy/priests who are qualitatively different from the rest of the New
Covenant community. In conclusion, the titles, "rabbi"
"father" and "leader" may be used, but with
humility. (Loren Jacobs)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Question: According to Galatians 3:26-29,
all Believers are one in Messiah, and there is no longer Jew or Gentile.
Why do you continue to make a distinction between Jews and Gentiles?
Aren't we all Christians now, and no longer Jews or Gentiles?
Answer: Let's look at the passage in
question: "For you are all sons of God through faith in Messiah
Yeshua. For all of you who were baptized into Messiah have clothed
yourselves with Messiah. There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is
neither slave nor free man, there is neither male nor female; for you
are all one in Messiah Yeshua. And if you belong to Messiah, then you
are Abraham's descendants, heirs according to promise."
Rabbi Paul is not teaching us that all earthly differences between men
and women, and between Jews and Gentiles automatically disappear when we
become Believers in the Messiah. "There is neither Jew nor
Greek" is not meant to be interpreted literally any more than
"there is neither male nor female." Men who believe in Messiah
are still men. Women who have encountered Yeshua are still women. In
fact, Rabbi Paul teaches elsewhere that there are distinct
"roles" for the sexes. For example, spiritual leaders of
communities must be men - not women. Men are to be the leaders of the
home - not the women. If we understood Paul's words literally, and there
were no longer any differences between men and women, then men could
marry men, and women could marry women - something which is clearly
wrong. Just as there are still differences between men and women in
Messiah's New Covenant Community, so too there are differences between
slaves and those who are free, and there are differences between Jews
and Gentiles.
The New Testament itself makes distinctions between Gentile Believers
and Jewish Believers. That's why Paul, who identified himself as "a
Jew from Tarsus" could also say to the Gentile Christians in Rome,
"I am speaking to you who are Gentiles (Romans 11:13)." In
fact, it's quite possible that differences between men and women and
Jews and Gentiles will continue in the Age To Come. In the book of
Revelation, even though the Son of God is resurrected and glorified, He
is still revealed to be a Man. Even more specifically, He is identified
as belonging to the tribe of Judah and the Root of David (see Revelation
5:5). I find it interesting that throughout eternity, the names of the
twelve tribes of Israel are written on the everlasting gates of the New
Jerusalem (Revelation 21:12). In addition, "the nations" will
walk by the light of the Eternal City, and the glory and honor of the
"nations" will be brought into it. The leaves of the Tree of
Life are for the healing of the "nations." God has ordained
that followers of the Messiah come from every nation, tribe, people and
language group; and these differences in language, culture and identity
remain on Earth, and some may even endure into Eternity.
This ongoing difference between Jews and Gentiles manifests itself in
several ways. For example, Messianic Jews should be circumcised for
religious reasons, since we are still special participants in the
covenant made with Abraham. Paul circumcised Timothy, since he had a
Jewish mother (see Acts 16:1-3). On the other hand, Messianic Gentiles
must not be circumcised for religious reasons, as Rabbi Paul makes clear
in his letter to the Galatians. They are to be content with being
circumcised in their hearts. However, Gentiles Believers may have their
sons circumcised for medical reasons, but not for religious reasons.
So what does Rabbi Paul mean when he writes that there is neither Jew
nor Gentile, male nor female, slave nor free? He means that for all who
have joined themselves to Israel's Messiah, there is a new equality that
we have. Now that the Messiah has come, we have a new and equal access
to the God of Israel. He is equally our Heavenly Father. We can all come
boldly before His throne of grace at any time. We all share His Spirit.
We are brothers and sisters. However, earthly roles and differences
remain. Yes, all who genuinely believe in the God of Israel and the
Jewish Messiah are "Christians" - but "Christian"
simply means a follower of Christ (Messiah - Israel's Anointed King);
being a Christian does not mean that one's national and ethnic identity
are diminished. (Loren Jacobs)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Question: Now that I believe in Yeshua,
haven't I ceased being a Gentile and am now a "Spiritual Jew"
(Romans 2:28-29)? Haven't I been grafted into the Olive Tree (Romans
11)? Am I not part of the Commonwealth of Israel (Ephesians 2:12)? Am I
not a son of Abraham (Galatians 3:29)?
Answer: We have to be very clear about
our use of names and titles. The Holy Spirit is very careful in the
Scriptures that comprise the New Testament, not to identify Gentiles as
Jews. Gentiles are never told that they "become Jews" or
"convert to Judaism." Messiah's Holy Community of Jews and
Gentiles (the Church) is never said to "replace Israel,"
"take the place of Israel," or be the "New Israel."
What then is the relationship of Messianic Gentiles to the nation of
Israel? "Kosher-hearted" Gentiles are sons of Abraham. Abraham
is their spiritual father, but that doesn't make them Jews. They are
Abraham's offspring, but that doesn't mean that Christians are
"Jews" or "Spiritual Israel" or the "New
Israel." Abraham is the father of many nations, but not all those
nations are entitled to be called "Israel." Only those who are
descendants of Abraham through Isaac and Jacob can properly be called
"Jews" or "Israel." Gentiles who have found the
Messiah are not "Spiritual Jews." They are "Spiritual
Gentiles." If you look at the context of Romans 2:28-29, you will
see that Rabbi Paul is specifically addressing Jewish people (v.17). He
is teaching us that Jewish people who have saving faith in Messiah are
"Jews inwardly" and spiritually circumcised. You might be a
wild olive branch that has been grafted in to Israel's Olive Tree of
Salvation and Blessing, but you are a "partaker with us" - the
natural branches. You don't replace us. Yes, Gentile Believers are now
part of the Commonwealth of Israel, and have a new citizenship with the
Jewish saints, but that doesn't make you a Jew, any more than Paul
having Roman citizenship made him a physical descendant of Rome.
Properly identifying Messianic Jews and Gentiles as equal yet distinct
is important because of the ongoing differences in their earthly roles
and calling. "Replacement Theology" - the teaching that the
Church is the New Israel and has replaced the Jewish people, is the
result of a flawed interpretation of Scripture. It is wrong and has
contributed to considerable violence against the Jewish people (Loren
Jacobs).
|